I've got a
page where I am collecting ideas for attaching high speed spindles
of one kind or another temporarily to my mill. I added some new pictures
to the page today. I call such pages "Idea Notebooks" and there
is a list of them on the Cookbook Page. Here
are the piccies I added:
I wanted to add the calculations
for ballnose cutter compensation to my G-Wizard
Feeds and Speeds Calculator, so I got to researching ballnose cutter
compensation calculations, scallop height calculations, and all that sort
of thing. Somewhere along that way, I came across references to "Sturz
Milling." This
Ingersoll treatise on their indexable ballnose cutters had some of
the best data.
The notion here is that the
speed of a ballnose cutter varies depending on your depth of cut. If you
have very little depth of cut relative to the diameter of the ball, you
actually have a much different effective tool diameter. You'll need to
speed up your rpm's to take into account that effective diameter. For
example, an 0.100" depth of cut on a 1/2" ballnose endmill actually
uses an 0.400" effective tool diameter, not the 1/2" you may
have thought. G-Wizard figures out all of that stuff for you just by checking
a box.
But what is this "Sturz
Milling?" Essentially, it is the idea of tilting the cutter relative
to the normal to the surface being machined to keep the very tip from
cutting. That tip is a "dead spot" on the cutter because it
isn't moving very fast. Being able to easily do these tilts is a big advantage
for a 5-axis machine doing 3D profiling. However, even on a 3D mill, you
can try to orient the workpiece so the cutter is never perpendicular to
the surface you need to 3D profile. For some parts, this may make a big
difference both in terms of how fast you can machine and for the surface
finish.
The Ingersoll pamphlet has
a few other interesting ideas. For example, the suggest reduce the feedrate
as an indexable cutter enters the cut. The reason is that until you reach
full engagement, not all the inserts are cutting. There is definitely
a noticeable roughness I've seen at the beginning and end of a pass with
the facemill, for example. It would be interesting to fool with the feedrates
there to see if it could be smoothed out a bit.
They also suggest slowing down
in a corner by 50%, but not dwelling. Corners are definitely an area where
there can be a lot higher engagement, so slowing down there can be helpful.
Conversely, if you have created a g-code program that works great through
the corners, you're probably going too slow on the straight paths!
Another great Ingersoll resource
is this tech
pamphlet on milling cutters. It's got all sorts of great information
on chip thinning, lead angles, and other useful data. For example, they
discuss the impact of lead angle on milling cutters. Consider two face
mills. One has a 90 design and can be used to create square shoulders.
The other has a 45 degree design. Why would you ever want the 45 degree
face mill? Because the lead angle changes the performance of the cutter
in some interesting ways. Consider the geometry:
The 45 degree
face mill is on the left, and the 90 degree is on the right. You can see
from the diagram that because of the angle, the equivalent depth of cut
is much less for the 45 degree mill. In fact, you have to multiply the
feed by 1.4 to get the same depth of cut, which corresponds to the chip
load. So you can feed a 45 degree face mill 1.4x as fast as a 90 degree
face mill. Whoa! It turns out your surface finish with the 45 degree face
mill is often a lot nicer as well.
As you can imagine,
similar calculations can be done for face mills that have circular inserts.
These are often called "button cutters" although some manufacturers
call them "toroidal cutters" too.
Have you heard
of "high feed" inserts or cutters? I like to think of them as
combining some of the best of both lead angle and button cutter capabilities.
Imagine an insert that has radiused corners with a big radius (that's
the button cutter) and further, imagine the insert is mounted at an angle
so that that straight edges connecting those corners generate a nice lead
angle effect too.
Cool beans!
10/12/09
Star Trek
in the Machine Shop: Tricorder or Phaser?
Yes, I'll admit, I'm a Trekkie.
That's getting to date me I think. What's this all about?
The sorter performs
a function not unlike Mr Spock's Tricorder (although it looks to me more
like a Phaser!). Specifically, you point it at a piece of metal alloy,
pull the trigger, and it tells you what the alloy is. How does it work?
It's an X-ray spectrometer. It basically zaps the metal with an X-ray
and then looks to see what the metal does in response.
Cool beans!
Manufacturers
use them to make sure alloys on projects where the material has to be
"right" are as specified. It's all part of a manufacturing process
called PMI for "Positive Material Identification."
10/11/09
Servo Drive
Reviews and a Big Drive for Your Spindle
Macona on
the HSM board recently called my attention to this review
page for servo drives done by TheCubeStudio. That's a very cool review
page, nice to see all the pros and cons from someone that actually tried
to get all of the drives working. I learned about a couple of drives I
would not want to try my own money on!
Because of the reviews, I became
aware of the reviewer's favorite drives which are made by www.cncdrive.com
out of Hungary. They look like extremely nice drives. I am always on the
lookout for larger drives, on the off-chance I want to use one for the
spindle of a CNC. Big drives are often expensive and not available to
the low end market unless via the surplus and used markets such as eBay.
It's very handy to have a servo driving your spindle for such things as
positioning for a tool changer (CAT40 and many other tapers have "drive
ears" that have to be lined up), or in the case of a lathe, indexing
for live tooling, for example to drill a bolt circle on a flange.
CNCDrive's largest drive is
called the Dugong,
and it can handle 160V at 35 amps. With a 20% safety factor, that would
be about 4.5 KW = 6 HP. That's more than enough for a lot of spindle purposes.
They cost less than $200, which seems very reasonable. The other thing
I like about these drives is they connect via USB to allow tuning with
software, so no need for an oscilloscope.
I may have to try one at some
point!
The other cool device from
Macona's post is the Teensy Arduino
USB controller. These little boards are a complete PC on a chip with
the ability to control signals such as relays and so forth. Lots of possibilities
for such an easy-to-program and inexpensive device. The thread talks about
using steppers or servos to automate a surface grinder that lacked a power
feed, and that would be an excellent place to start.
10/3/09
Chuck-In-A-Vise
and Other Wisdom of the Widgitmaster
I liked the Fidgeting Widgitmaster's
little fixture to keep a small 3-jaw chuck handy in your Kurt vise:
I guess you
can leave the key in the lathe chuck when it's on the mill!
The chuck is mounted
on a steel block so it's easy to clamp or just drop into the vise. It'd
be easy to use on a drill press or rotary table too I bet! It would even
be handy just for the bench.
I need to make
one up for my own shop.
9/20/09
Milling Quite
a Compound Angle
Some machines have interesting
capabilities:
9/13/09
Organize
Your Lathe Tooling: New Idea Notebook
I came across a bunch of new
ideas for how to organize your lathe tooling, so I created a
page to show it off. Idea Notebooks are what I call pages that have
lots of ideas for how to do a particular project. You can see the list
of them on the Cookbook page.
Here is a typical sample from
the Lathe Tooling Organization page:
9/12/09
Widget Squares
a Block (And Builds a Cool CNC Router)
I just got done looking through
the thread
on one of the Widgitmaster's latest creations on CNCZone. He's busy
converting one of his earlier 24x24" routers from v-groove pulleys
to round linear rails. Keep an eye on it if you like the machine that
results as he will be selling it on eBay.
I always learn a thing or two
watching Eric's meticulously documented projects, and I like to share
those learnings here.
Here are some highlights:
Got a big workpiece?
Make yourself a rig like this. Aluminum softjaws span 2 vises. Widget
is tramming the vises with his DTI against the jaw...
Yes, it's aluminum,
and yes that's a 4 flute endmill. Why? Because it isn't a pocket, it's
peripheral, so the chips can easily get out of the way. And, because you
can feed a 4 flute twice as fast for a given spindle speed. Nicer surface
finish too, in my experience...
Two things to
note while squaring this block. First, check out the Starrett vise hold
downs on either side of the block in the vise. Need to get a set of those
myself! Second, check out the great big fly cutter he is using...
Having changed
leadscrews, Widget needs to rebuild the hold to fit the new leadscrew.
To do that, he wants to shrink fit that plug into the hole and then machine
the plug for the new mounting...
The plug, 0.0005"
oversized, goes into the ice box, and the assembly is heated with the
OxyAcetylene torch. Drop the plug in and tap it with the sledge and it
is going nowhere!
It might as
well all be one piece of aluminum...
Do you have
a problem with larger twist drills twisting in your chucks and getting
scarred up? I do. Silver and Demings are the biggest, but they all share
a common shank size, so you can stick them into an endmill holder. A little
Weldon shank action on that big bit and you'd really be able to lock it
in place in the holder...
Boring a really
deep hole, how do you minize the chatter?
Take a large
diameter lathe boring bar, one with a shank that would never fit your
boring head. Turn down the shank until it does fit the head, like a Silver
and Deming twist drill bit. Smart!
Indicating the
slitting saw in with some space blocks so the middle of the saw cut is
just where it needs to be relative to the top of workpiece. Widget suggests
plunging the saw straight in rather than starting from the side when cutting
because the hole will keep the saw centered instead of pulling it off
axis...
Lots of goodness
here: Outside vise jaws will be used to clamp a big workpiece. Not only
are the outside, but they are wider than the vise. Widget is milling a
step into them to use instead of parallels (how will you get parallels
in there anyway), and since the steps are milled, they're prefectly trammed.
Lastly, check the 1-2-3 blocks and drill rod. Drill rod keeps from overconstraining
the setup (i.e. makes it more accurate) and having them in there loads
the vise as though there is a workpiece in there...
This gantry
router uses 2 vertical arms. Widget rough saws the arms on the bandsaw,
but all edges will need to be milled square...
Widget had been
thinking ahead. He has two holes for dowel pins that in the material that
will be milled away. The dowel pins let him line up the milling pass perfectly
because they align the workpieces against the square mill table edge...
Having clamped
the workpiece using the dowel pins for alignment, Widget removed the pins
and made his milling pass. Now he has a nice square edge in exactly the
right place!
Here's What
We're Building. Looking Good!
9/5/09
Check Out
Glacern
I just got some real nice ER32
collet chucks on R8 shank from Glacern.
Cool products and good people to work with. I love the idea that of companies
like Glacern and MariTool building tooling domestically and selling very
nice tooling at competitive prices. Check out this great video Glacern
did:
Very cool: Gotta love that
killer Mori VMC too!
Their vises look very nice
as well. Would be very tempting if I were in the market for one.
The fixed jaw
slides along the shaft. The movable jaw is the indicator's probe...
And another from
the same thread by John Stevenson:
Finally, this
beauty is evidently a design published in Model Engineer magazine in the
1980s:
Set to maximum
bore diameter range...
Set to minimum
diameter range...
These are all
relative measuring devices. They need calibration against some standard,
though a micrometer should work easily enough. They can then tell you
how the bore compares to the standard using the dial indicators.
8/24/09
Offset Relative
to the Machine, Not the Part
I was reading a
thread on Practical Machinist this evening that jogged some thoughts
loose that had been rattling around, but which I had not gotten into a
coherent state:
On a CNC machine,
you want to set things up as much as possible so everything is relative
to your machine, not your part.
I can tell you from experience
that this isn't how newcomers think about it, but it makes a lot of sense
if you're trying to do anything on a production basis versus a one off.
Most of the time I've been coming in and touching off some feature of
the block I start from, for example touching off the top of the part to
establish the Z = 0.0 datum. Typically, I would slap a chunk of material
in the vise, touch off by eye (close enough) to start squaring the piece,
get it squared, and then wind up touching off again with a Z-axis presetter
before I started my CNC job.
If you're setting up relative
to a part, you've got to indicate the machine, touch off, or otherwise
let the machine know where the part is for each and every part. But if
you're set up relative to the machine, that's not a problem because your
machine isn't going to move around--or at least it had better not!
My friend Pete in Hawaii takes
this one step further. He has established a reference 0, 0, 0 point relative
to the vise jaws in his mill. He does all of his CAD/CAM work with the
expectation of that reference point. This way, he drops a block into the
vise, hits the green button, and away it goes. Multiple vises? You've
got offsets to deal with that too. Likewise if you run a fixture plate,
it would seem advantageous to get out your probe and log the coordinates
of all the salient features of the fixture plate. For fixtures, a lot
of shops put a feature on the feature that they can dial in on once the
fixture is installed on their mill. I've even seen this done on soft jaws
for vises, which are not repeatable when you swap them on a Kurt vise.
A precision hole is one easy feature to dial in on for vise jaws.
What about dealing with variations
in rough workpieces? Set some standards. Machine Shop Trade Secrets suggests
you bandsaw workpieces to within a 1/10 of an inch. If you're running
production, that's probably not a bad figure to adhere to. Use a stop
on your saw if you're manually feeding to make sure each piece comes out
close enough. A variation of 1/10 of an inch is nothing to a face mill
if you're going to surface that edge before starting to machine. If you're
on a smaller machine where it really matters, set it up to take 1/2 of
that 1/10th out (50 thousandths) on the first surfacing pass. If you're
really accurate to 1/10, you'll be pretty close to that 50 thou cut or
it'll be less. If your parts are 2D contoured with a laser or water jet
before they go on the CNC, they should be well within these tolerances.
8/16/09
I've Been
Busy!
I've gotten a number of notes
lately from folks wondering what I've been up to and why it has been so
long since I've posted an update to the Cookbook. The short answer is
I've been busy on other things--it's probably been a month since I did
anything in my shop. To give a little more color on that, I've been busy
with a combination of vacation and accepting a new job as CEO of Helpstream.
Needless to say I am still not caught up on the latter--CEO Is a big job.
But, I am starting to glimpse a slight glow ahead. Hopefully that turns
into light at the end of the tunnel in the not too distant future.
Meanwhile, I do still find
a little time to read online so I'll try to do a little writing. In between
reading about machine work, I have also been doing a little programming
that's related. I'm going to keep that one under wraps for the time being,
but eventually it will turn into a nice surprise I think.
Most of the thinking on the
thread has to do with making the dovetail in several parts ala this drawing
by Brian Rupnow:
Note the use of
dowel pins to accurately locate the femail dovetails. Another approach
might be to machine a shoulder they could position against. Some locating
is needed because bolts are not for locating unless they have shoulders
so they can act like the dowel pins.
Atty showed a
picture of a QCTP holder made the way Brian suggests and sure enough it
came out pretty nicely:
No dowel pins,
but he says it works well. For holders, especially, I think a machined
slot could provide the locating as well as a little more rigidity.
Lastly, Paul Alciatore
presented this very slick alternative to the dovetail approach:
This design would
be extremely easy to make. It clamps against the flat of the toolpost.
I assume height could be adjusted with a setscrew bearing against the
holder flange at the bottom. Generally, it looks more solid to my eye
than the Aloris-style.